Steel Beam Design per NSCP 2015 / AISC 360: Flexure, Shear, and Deflection with a Worked Example
By Engr. Ruel H. Cepeda, Structural Engineer
NSCP 2015 Chapter 5 (Structural Steel) is based on AISC 360 (the 2010 edition) and permits either Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) or Allowable Strength Design (ASD). This article covers the LRFD checks for a laterally supported, compact W-shape beam — flexure, compact limits, lateral-torsional buckling, shear, deflection — with ASD equivalents, then sizes a 6 m simply supported floor beam by worked example.
LRFD and ASD: Two Paths, One Code
LRFD compares factored demand (from factored loads, e.g. 1.2D + 1.6L) against factored capacity, φRn, φ<1. ASD compares service-load demand (unfactored D + L) against allowable capacity, Rn/Ω, Ω>1. Both are valid under NSCP 2015 / AISC 360 and size similar members — but never mix the two in one check. LRFD is the more common basis in current Philippine practice and is used below, with ASD shown for comparison.
Step 1 — Required Flexural and Shear Strength
For a simply supported beam under uniform gravity load, factor the loads: wu = 1.2wD + 1.6wL, then get the required strengths from statics: Mu = wuL²/8 Vu = wuL/2, with L the span. Wind, seismic, and other combinations may govern other members, but gravity D + L almost always governs a floor beam.
Step 2 — Nominal Flexural Strength of a Compact, Braced Beam
For a compact section with the compression flange continuously braced, or braced at intervals not exceeding Lp (Step 4), AISC 360 Chapter F gives the nominal flexural strength as the full plastic moment:
Mn = Mp = Fy·Zx
LRFD: φbMn≥Mu, φb=0.90. ASD: Mn/Ωb≥Ma, Ωb=1.67. Zx, the plastic section modulus, exceeds the elastic Sx since it reflects full plastic yield rather than first yield at the extreme fiber.
Step 3 — Compact-Section Limits (Local Buckling)
Mn = Mp only holds while flange and web stay under the compact limit λp, AISC 360 Table B4.1b:
| Element | Slenderness Ratio λ | Compact Limit λp |
|---|---|---|
| Flange (flange local buckling) | bf/2tf | 0.38√(E/Fy) |
| Web (web local buckling) | h/tw | 3.76√(E/Fy) |
E = 200,000 MPa. Rolled W-shapes are compact in the web at nearly all common yield strengths; flange compactness varies by shape and is the check worth confirming. Between λp and the noncompact/slender limit λr, Mn reduces linearly toward 0.7FySx; beyond λr elastic local buckling governs, a further reduction. Uncommon for current hot-rolled catalogs — manufacturer tables usually flag compactness directly.
Step 4 — Lateral-Torsional Buckling and Bracing
Between brace points the compression flange can buckle sideways and twist (LTB) before reaching Mp. AISC 360 Chapter F sets the behavior by unbraced length Lb against limits Lp and Lr:
- Lb ≤ Lp: Mn = Mp, as in Step 2.
- Lp < Lb ≤ Lr: inelastic LTB — Mn reduces linearly toward 0.7FySx, scaled by moment-gradient factor Cb (1.0 for uniform moment, higher for a favorable diagram such as uniform load).
- Lb > Lr: elastic LTB, Mn drops further; Lr needs torsional constants beyond ry and Fy — read it from a manufacturer/AISC table.
The compact, fully-braced limit: Lp = 1.76·ry·√(E/Fy). A deck fastened to the top flange gives continuous bracing, keeping Lb well under Lp; discrete braces (joists, purlins, straps) must be spaced within Lp for the same Mp capacity.
Step 5 — Shear Strength
AISC 360 G2.1 gives the nominal shear strength as Vn = 0.6·Fy·Aw·Cv1 (Cv1 is written Cv in AISC 360-10 / NSCP 2015), Aw = d·tw. For rolled I-shape webs with h/tw≤2.24√(E/Fy) — true for essentially all standard W-shapes — Cv1=1.0, φv=1.00 (LRFD), Ωv=1.50 (ASD); check φvVn≥Vu, or Vn/Ωv≥Va. Beyond that limit φv drops to 0.90 and Ωv rises to 1.67. Shear rarely governs an ordinary rolled beam, but check it — especially coped ends, deep girders, or heavily loaded short spans.
Step 6 — Deflection Serviceability
Maximum midspan deflection under uniform load: Δ = 5wL⁴/(384EI), using unfactored service loads. The limits commonly used in practice, consistent with the general deflection tables of the NSCP / IBC family: L/360 for live load alone (protecting finishes/ceilings) and L/240 for total load, D + L. Tighter limits — L/480 is typical — apply where vibration or plaster finishes are a concern; confirm the governing limit against the project spec. The same check applies under ASD; only flexure/shear switch to Ωb=1.67 and Ωv=1.50.
Worked Example — 6 m Simply Supported Floor Beam
Given: Span L = 6.0 m; dead load (incl. self-weight allowance) wD = 12.0 kN/m; live load wL = 8.0 kN/m (office); top flange continuously braced by a floor deck. Trial section: W310×39, A992-class steel, Fy = 345 MPa, E = 200,000 MPa.
Assumed section properties for this example (representative of a current manufacturer/AISC-CISC metric table; confirm before final design):
| Property | Symbol | Assumed Value |
|---|---|---|
| Depth | d | 310 mm |
| Flange width | bf | 165 mm |
| Flange thickness | tf | 9.7 mm |
| Web thickness | tw | 5.8 mm |
| Moment of inertia, strong axis | Ix | 84.8×10&sup6; mm⁴ |
| Elastic section modulus | Sx | 547×10³ mm³ |
| Plastic section modulus | Zx | 610×10³ mm³ |
| Weak-axis radius of gyration | ry | 38.3 mm |
| Web slenderness | h/tw | 47.2 |
| Flange slenderness | bf/2tf | 8.51 |
1. Factored and service loads
wu=1.2(12.0)+1.6(8.0)=14.4+12.8=27.2 kN/m.
Mu=27.2×6.0²/8=27.2×36/8=122.4 kN·m.
Vu=27.2×6.0/2=81.6 kN.
2–3. Compactness and bracing check
√(E/Fy)=√(200000/345)=√579.7=24.08.
Flange: λp=0.38×24.08=9.15; actual bf/2tf=8.51<9.15 — compact.
Web: λp=3.76×24.08=90.5; actual h/tw=47.2<90.5 — compact.
Lp=1.76×38.3×24.08=1623 mm≈1.62 m. The deck-braced top flange gives an effective Lb well under Lp, so Mn=Mp applies with no LTB reduction.
4. Flexural capacity
Mp=Fy·Zx=345×610×10³=210,450,000 N·mm=210.45 kN·m.
φbMn=0.90×210.45=189.4 kN·m.
Check: Mu/φbMn=122.4/189.4=0.65<1.0 — OK (65% utilized).
5. Shear capacity
2.24√(E/Fy)=2.24×24.08=53.9; actual h/tw=47.2<53.9 → Cv1=1.0, φv=1.00.
Aw=d·tw=310×5.8=1798 mm².
Vn=0.6×345×1798×1.0=372,186 N=372.2 kN.
φvVn=1.00×372.2=372.2 kN.
Check: Vu/φvVn=81.6/372.2=0.22<1.0 — OK (22% utilized).
6. Deflection
Live load only: ΔLL=5×8.0×6000⁴/(384×200000×84.8×10&sup6;) [w in N/mm, L in mm]=5×8×1.296×10¹&sup5;/(6.510×10¹&sup5;)=7.96 mm.
Limit: L/360=6000/360=16.67 mm. 7.96<16.67 — OK (48% utilized).
Total load (D+L): Δtotal=ΔLL×(20.0/8.0)=7.96×2.5=19.9 mm.
Limit: L/240=6000/240=25.0 mm. 19.9<25.0 — OK (80% utilized).
7. ASD cross-check
Ma=(12.0+8.0)×6.0²/8=20.0×4.5=90.0 kN·m; Mp/Ωb=210.45/1.67=126.0 kN·m>90.0 — OK (71% utilized).
Va=20.0×6.0/2=60.0 kN; Vn/Ωv=372.2/1.50=248.1 kN>60.0 — OK (24% utilized). Deflection is checked once, at service load, for both methods.
| Check (LRFD) | Demand | Capacity | Utilization |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexure | Mu=122.4 kN·m | φbMn=189.4 kN·m | 65% |
| Shear | Vu=81.6 kN | φvVn=372.2 kN | 22% |
| Deflection, total load | Δ=19.9 mm | L/240=25.0 mm | 80% (governs) |
W310×39 satisfies all three checks, with deflection — not strength — the closest call, a common outcome for floor beams at ordinary office loads. Cross-check any trial section with the free simple beam calculator and beam deflection calculator, or the sister site's beam calculator on RHCES.
Assumptions & Limitations
- Applies to compact, doubly symmetric hot-rolled W-shapes braced at Lb≤Lp; not noncompact/slender sections, built-up girders, or long unbraced lengths beyond Step 4's concept-level treatment.
- Single-span, simply supported, uniform gravity load only; axial load, torsion, and biaxial bending (AISC 360 Chapter H) are not addressed.
- Worked-example properties are assumed values for a nominal W310×39; confirm exact listed properties before final design.
- Fy=345 MPa (A992-class) is assumed; other grades, including Fy≈248 MPa (A36-class) still common locally, change every capacity and require a re-run.
- L/360 (live) / L/240 (total) are common defaults; some specs require tighter limits (e.g., L/480) — confirm the project spec.
- Composite action and connection design (bolts/welds, bearing, web crippling) are outside this article's scope.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can I use Mn = Mp = FyZx without a full LTB check?
When the section is compact (Step 3) and Lb≤Lp=1.76ry√(E/Fy). Continuous deck bracing or braces spaced within Lp both qualify; beyond Lp, use the Cb-based LTB provisions instead.
Why did the example pass flexure and shear with margin but deflection with less room?
Floor beams for ordinary loads are often deflection-governed: the stiffness for L/360 and L/240 typically exceeds what flexure and shear alone demand.
Should a Philippine project use LRFD or ASD?
NSCP 2015 permits either, applied consistently. LRFD is more common in current practice; ASD remains valid for quick hand checks. Never mix the two — a factored load is never compared against allowable capacity.
Checking flexure, shear, and deflection together — not strength alone — keeps a "passing" beam from becoming a bouncy or sagging floor on site. Try the simple beam calculator and beam deflection calculator, or browse all free web tools; offline spreadsheets are on the download page.
Comments
Loading comments...
Leave a Comment